Evaluation of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear Explosive (CBRNE) knowledge change and skills confidence among front-line providers during the Russia-Ukraine War

Publication information:

Timothy B. Erickson, Donell Harvin, Alexis Schmid, Gideon Loevinsohn, Anna Poriechna, Oleg Martyshyn, Kryrylo Kliukach, Meaghan Sydlowski, Jonathan Strong, and Sean M. Kivlehan. 2023. “Evaluation of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear Explosive (CBRNE) Knowledge Change and Skills Confidence Among Front-Line Providers During the Russia-Ukraine War”. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the change in knowledge and skill confidence after implementation of a CBRNE training course during the Russia-Ukraine War.

Methods:

Pre/post-test study in the Ukrainian cities of Kyiv, Dnipro, Zaporizhzhia, and Odesa. Fifteen CBRNE courses were conducted over a 3-month period, August – October 2022. Change in knowledge and skills confidence were evaluated with pre/post-course written exams and practical skill assessments that were observed during the training exercises. Changes were analyzed based on nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank testing. Pre/post self-efficacy surveys were analyzed with McNemar’s test for paired data. Course evaluations were conducted with standardized questions which assessed instruction quality, teaching relevance, knowledge gained, and post-course skills confidence.

Results:

523 participants registered and completed one of the fifteen courses. Overall mean pre-course test score: 57.8% (SD 20.7%); mean post-course test score: 81.4% (SD 11.3%); participants with increasing test scores: 90.7%; mean difference in score (95% CI) 23.6% (21.2%–25.9%), p<0.0001. Pre/post self-efficacy surveys (4-point Likert scale) noted participants recognized signs and symptoms of a CBRNE incident, and necessary skills to manage CBRNE exposures, p<0.0001.

Conclusions:

The implementation of this CBRNE course for front-line providers in Ukraine was successful. To our knowledge, it was the first implementation of a field course during the current Russian-Ukraine war. Future research should evaluate knowledge retention and impact of our innovative “train-the trainer” model. Further iterations should emphasize expanding the quantity of training equipment and practical skill sessions.